No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Court granted plaintiff's default judgment motion against Corporate Defendants (Franklin Finest Deli Corp, Franklin Finest Inc. II, and Bedford Gourmet Deli Corp) and awarded $42,814.96 in damages for unpaid minimum wage, overtime, spread of hours pay, liquidated damages, pre-judgment interest, and attorneys' fees under the FLSA and New York Labor Law. Plaintiff's claims against individual defendant Obayah were denied due to failure to comply with the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act.
Nicholas v. Franklin Finest Deli Corp: Court Rules in Worker's Favor
What Happened
A worker named Nicholas filed a lawsuit against Franklin Finest Deli Corp and related companies for wage theft. He claimed the employer failed to pay him the required minimum wage, overtime compensation, and proper payment for irregular work schedules.
What the Court Decided
The court sided with Nicholas and ordered the deli companies to pay him $42,814.96 in damages. This amount included unpaid wages, overtime pay, penalties for irregular scheduling, and attorney fees. The court issued this judgment after the employer failed to respond properly to the lawsuit. However, the judge dismissed claims against an individual owner due to a military service protection law.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case reinforces that employers cannot ignore wage and hour laws. Workers who are shortchanged on pay have legal options to recover money owed, including damages beyond the actual wages lost. The court's decision shows that companies that fail to properly defend themselves in court face serious financial consequences, sending a message that wage theft violations will be taken seriously.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.