Skip to main content

Lal Dagami Magar v. Tika Indian Restaurant LLC

D. Conn.May 13, 2025No. 3:24-cv-01564
Plaintiff WinTika Indian Restaurant LLC$1,643.75 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to compel

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

Plaintiffs prevailed on their motion to compel discovery and were awarded reasonable attorneys' fees of $1,643.75 (reduced from their request of $4,970) for work on the motion to compel and the fee petition itself.

What This Ruling Means

This case involved a dispute between Lal Dagami Magar and Tika Indian Restaurant LLC over alleged violations of federal wage and hour laws. Magar claimed that the restaurant failed to follow the Fair Labor Standards Act, which sets rules for minimum wage, overtime pay, and other workplace standards that protect workers' rights to fair compensation. The court dismissed the case, meaning Magar's claims were rejected and no damages were awarded. While the specific details of why the court dismissed the case aren't provided in the available information, this outcome means the restaurant was not found liable for any wage and hour violations. For workers, this case highlights the importance of understanding your rights under federal wage and hour laws. The Fair Labor Standards Act protects employees by requiring employers to pay at least minimum wage and overtime compensation for hours worked beyond 40 per week. However, as this case shows, not all claims succeed in court. Workers who believe their employer has violated wage and hour laws should carefully document their hours worked, wages received, and any potential violations. It's also important to understand that employment law cases can be complex, and outcomes depend on the specific facts and evidence presented.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.