Skip to main content

Operating Engineers Local 139 Health Benefit Fund v. Lake Effect Construction Inc

E.D. Wis.June 2, 2025No. 2:25-cv-00273
Plaintiff WinLake Effect Construction Inc.$2,223.92 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
default judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

Court granted default judgment in favor of the Operating Engineers Local 139 Health Benefit Fund and related plaintiffs against Lake Effect Construction Inc. for failure to make required ERISA contributions under a collective bargaining agreement, awarding $2,223.92 in damages.

What This Ruling Means

**Health Fund Sues Construction Company Over Unpaid Benefits** This case involved a dispute between Operating Engineers Local 139 Health Benefit Fund and Lake Effect Construction Inc over unpaid health benefit contributions. The health fund, which provides medical benefits to union construction workers, sued the company claiming it failed to make required payments into the workers' health benefit fund as required under ERISA (federal law governing employee benefit plans). The court case appears to have ended without a clear resolution, with the outcome listed as "unresolvable" and no damages awarded to either party. This suggests the dispute may have been settled outside of court, dismissed on procedural grounds, or resolved through other means before reaching a final judgment. **What This Means for Workers:** This case highlights an important issue for unionized workers - employers must fulfill their obligations to contribute to health benefit funds. When companies fail to make these payments, workers' healthcare coverage can be at risk. Union health funds actively monitor and pursue legal action against non-compliant employers to protect workers' benefits. Even though this particular case didn't reach a definitive court ruling, it demonstrates that benefit funds will take legal action to enforce contribution requirements and protect workers' healthcare security.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.