Skip to main content

Carrasquillo v. Westech Security and Investigation Inc.

S.D.N.Y.June 2, 2025No. 1:23-cv-04931
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

Court granted conditional certification of collective action under FLSA for similarly situated security guards employed by defendant in New York State on or after October 18, 2021, but denied certification for patrol drivers and site supervisors. Court approved modified notice and ordered defendant to produce employee contact information and compensation data.

What This Ruling Means

**Carrasquillo v. Westech Security: FLSA Wage Claim Dismissed** This case involved a worker who sued Westech Security and Investigation Inc., claiming the company violated federal wage and hour laws under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The employee, Carrasquillo, alleged that the security company failed to properly pay wages as required by federal law, which typically involves issues like unpaid overtime, minimum wage violations, or improper wage calculations. **The Court's Decision** The federal court in New York's Southern District dismissed the case entirely. No damages were awarded to the worker, meaning the court ruled against the employee's claims. The dismissal indicates the court found either that the worker failed to prove their case or that there were legal grounds preventing the lawsuit from moving forward. **What This Means for Workers** This outcome highlights the challenges workers face when pursuing wage and hour claims. Successfully proving FLSA violations requires proper documentation of hours worked and wages owed. Workers should keep detailed records of their work schedules, pay stubs, and any overtime hours. When facing potential wage theft, consulting with an employment attorney early can help determine whether you have a strong case before filing a lawsuit.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.