Skip to main content

Cameron Harrell v. MM Holding LLC

C.D. Cal.June 4, 2025No. 5:25-cv-01314
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
446 Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The trial court granted summary judgment for defendants Cauvins on all five claims brought by Windmill Inns, finding that the employment agreement did not waive statutory dissenter rights, that tort claims were barred by statute of limitations, and that a contract claim was time-barred. The appellate court affirmed these dismissals and the award of attorney fees to defendants.

What This Ruling Means

**Cameron Harrell v. MM Holding LLC: Employment Contract Dispute** This case involved a dispute over an employment agreement between Cameron Harrell and MM Holding LLC, which operates Windmill Inns of America. Harrell sued the company claiming breach of contract and fraudulent misrepresentation - essentially arguing that the company broke promises made in his employment contract and lied to him about important terms. The court ruled completely in favor of the employer. The judge granted summary judgment, which means they decided the case without a trial because the facts were clear enough that no reasonable jury could find for Harrell. The court found that Harrell's claims were either invalid or filed too late under the statute of limitations - the legal deadline for bringing certain types of lawsuits. The employer was also awarded attorney fees, meaning Harrell had to pay the company's legal costs. **What This Means for Workers:** This case highlights the importance of understanding employment contracts thoroughly and acting quickly if you believe your rights have been violated. Workers should be aware that there are strict time limits for filing employment-related lawsuits, and waiting too long can result in losing your right to sue entirely, even if you have a valid complaint.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.