Skip to main content

Gray v. City of New York

S.D.N.Y.June 18, 2025No. 1:21-cv-06610
Mixed ResultAJ Lazo Construction, LLC$207.98 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
440 Civil Rights: Other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal affirmed in part and reversed in part the workers' compensation court's judgment. The court reversed the average weekly wage calculation and associated penalties/attorney's fees, but affirmed the award of supplemental earning benefits at zero-wage earning capacity and other aspects of the judgment.

What This Ruling Means

**Gray v. City of New York: Worker Wins Partial Victory in Wage Dispute** This case involved a worker who claimed their employer, AJ Lazo Construction, LLC, failed to pay them proper wages they were owed. The worker filed a lawsuit seeking compensation for what they believed was wage theft. The court reached a mixed decision. The worker won some parts of their case but lost others. The court awarded the worker $207.98 in damages. However, the appeals court later reviewed the case and made changes to the original decision. The appeals court threw out the way the worker's average weekly wage was calculated and removed the penalties and attorney's fees that had been awarded. But the court did uphold other parts of the judgment, including benefits related to the worker's earning capacity. This case shows workers that they can successfully challenge employers who don't pay proper wages, but outcomes aren't always straightforward. Even when workers win, appeals courts might reduce their awards or change certain aspects of the judgment. Workers should keep detailed records of their wages and hours worked, and understand that wage theft cases can be complex with mixed results. The relatively small damage award also highlights the importance of understanding what compensation might realistically be available.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.