Skip to main content

TYSKA v. ZIMMER BIOMET HOLDINGS, INC.

D.N.J.July 30, 2025No. 1:24-cv-00817
Plaintiff WinHayes Management Services, Inc.$111,172 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
442 Civil Rights: Jobs
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
jury verdict

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationRetaliationHarassmentHostile Work Environment

Outcome

Plaintiff Carbajal prevailed on all claims for sexual harassment and retaliation against her employer, receiving a jury verdict of $111,172.00 in damages. The court awarded an additional $349,496.00 in attorney fees and $3,262.11 in costs.

What This Ruling Means

**Employee Wins Sexual Harassment and Retaliation Case** This case involved an employee named Carbajal who sued her employer, Hayes Management Services, Inc., for sexual harassment and retaliation. Carbajal claimed she experienced sexual harassment at work and that her employer retaliated against her when she complained about the inappropriate behavior. She also alleged that the harassment created a hostile work environment and that she faced discrimination. The court sided completely with Carbajal. A jury found that her employer was responsible for the sexual harassment and retaliation she experienced. The jury awarded her $111,172 in damages to compensate for the harm she suffered. Additionally, the court ordered the company to pay an extra $349,496 for her attorney fees and $3,262 in court costs. This ruling is significant for workers because it shows that courts will hold employers accountable for sexual harassment and retaliation. The substantial attorney fee award (over three times the damages) demonstrates that employees who win these cases can have their legal costs covered, making it more feasible for workers to pursue justice. It reinforces that employees have the right to work in an environment free from sexual harassment and cannot be punished for reporting such behavior.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.