Skip to main content

D'AGOSTINO v. DOMINO'S PIZZA, INC.

D.N.J.August 6, 2025No. 3:17-cv-11603
SettlementState Street Corporation$4,300,000 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
710 Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
consent decree

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

Class action settlement approved preliminarily with $4,300,000 common fund. Court addressed attorneys' fees motion and scrutinized counsel's fee request of 33-1/3% of the settlement fund.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** This was a class action lawsuit against Domino's Pizza where workers claimed the company breached their employment contracts. The specific details of the contract violations aren't provided in the available information, but it involved multiple employees who joined together to sue the pizza chain for allegedly not following the terms of their employment agreements. **What the Court Decided** The court gave preliminary approval to a $4.3 million settlement between the workers and Domino's Pizza. This means the company agreed to pay this amount to resolve the dispute without admitting wrongdoing. The court also reviewed the lawyers' request to take one-third of the settlement money (about $1.4 million) as their legal fees, which is typical in class action cases. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case shows that employees can band together in class action lawsuits when employers allegedly violate employment contracts that affect multiple workers. Even large companies like Domino's may choose to settle rather than fight in court when facing serious contract breach claims. The substantial settlement amount demonstrates that courts take employment contract violations seriously, and workers may be entitled to significant compensation when their rights are violated.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.