No specific laws identified for this ruling.
The court approved a settlement agreement in which defendants Gilbane Building Company and P&D Contractors agreed to pay plaintiffs $85,000 total, consisting of $22,390.35 in W-2 wages, $22,390.35 in non-wage damages, and $40,219.30 in attorney fees and costs, resolving wage theft and employee misclassification claims.
Worker Wins $85,000 Settlement Over Unpaid Wages and Wrongful Firing
This case involved a worker named Seredina who sued two construction companies, Gilbane Building Company and P&D Contractors, claiming they stole wages and wrongfully fired her. Seredina argued that the companies failed to pay her properly and terminated her employment illegally. She also claimed the companies misclassified her as an employee, which can affect wages and benefits workers are entitled to receive.
The court approved a settlement agreement where both companies agreed to pay Seredina a total of $85,000. This payment included about $22,000 in actual wages she should have received, another $22,000 in additional damages, and roughly $40,000 to cover her attorney fees and legal costs.
This case matters for workers because it shows that employees can successfully fight back when employers don't pay proper wages or fire them illegally. The settlement demonstrates that companies can face significant financial consequences for wage theft and employee misclassification. Workers who believe their employers have stolen wages or wrongfully terminated them may have legal options available, and courts will enforce settlements that make workers whole for their losses.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Other orders and opinions in Seredina from the same court.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.