Pastuizaca v. Mihwa Jo Corp
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- 710 Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- summary judgment
- State
- New York
- Circuit
- Second Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
Plaintiff obtained summary judgment on overtime, spread-of-hours, and wage notice claims under New York Labor Law for 16 weeks of underpayment. The court awarded $27,857 in damages including unpaid overtime wages, spread-of-hours violations, wage notice violations, and liquidated damages. A subsequent motion for reconsideration addressed the calculation methodology for overtime wages based on applicable wage orders.
What This Ruling Means
Pastuizaca v. Mihwa Jo Corp: Plain English Summary
What Happened
An employee sued Mihwa Jo Corp for wage theft under New York labor laws. The worker claimed the company failed to pay proper overtime, violated rules about spread-of-hours pay (compensation for working split shifts), and didn't provide required wage notices to employees.
What the Court Decided
The court sided with the employee. A judge ruled that Mihwa Jo Corp owed $27,857 in damages for 16 weeks of unpaid wages. This included back pay for overtime hours, spread-of-hours compensation, penalties for failing to provide wage notices, and additional "liquidated damages" (extra money as punishment for the violations). The court had to recalculate how much overtime was owed based on the company's specific wage requirements.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case reinforces that New York employers must pay overtime correctly, compensate workers for split-shift arrangements, and inform employees of their pay rates. Workers who believe they've been underpaid can pursue court cases to recover missing wages plus penalties. Companies that cut corners on these requirements face significant financial consequences.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
More Rulings in This Case
Other orders and opinions in Pastuizaca from the same court.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.