Domino's Pizza, LLC
22 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (1997–2025)
7 trusted published court opinions across 6 distinct cases
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Domino's Pizza, LLC as an employer in 22 distinct federal employment cases between 1997 and 2025.
Of the 7 trusted published opinions analyzed, the most common outcomes were: 3 ended in a ruling for the worker, 2 had a mixed result, 1 settled, and 1 was sent back to a lower court.
The most common claims on record were Wage Theft, Wrongful Termination, and Discrimination.
Cases were filed across 6 states, most often in NJ.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 6 distinct cases.
Jurisdictions represented in the analyzed opinions.
About this employer
Domino's Pizza, LLC appears in 7 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
D'AGOSTINO v. DOMINO'S PIZZA, INC. (2025) — Settlement. An employee filed a lawsuit against Domino's Pizza claiming wage theft and wrongful termination. The employee and Domino's reached a settlement agreement in April 2024 to resolve the dispute. Read the ruling.
D'AGOSTINO v. DOMINO'S PIZZA, INC. (2024) — Mixed Result. A worker filed a case against Domino's Pizza claiming the company didn't pay wages owed and wrongfully fired them. During the court process, the worker asked to question certain people—including a company founder and former coworkers—and to access information about Domino's previous legal disputes. Read the ruling.
Edmond Carmona v. Domino's Pizza, LLC (2021) — Plaintiff Win. Edmond Carmona, a Domino's delivery driver, sued the company claiming it violated California labor laws. Domino's tried to stop the lawsuit by forcing Carmona into private arbitration—a private dispute process—rather than allowing him to take the case to court. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Wage Theft (4 of 7), Wrongful Termination (4 of 7), Discrimination. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Wage Theft, Wrongful Termination and Discrimination.
Published opinions span New Jersey (2), Florida (1), Minnesota (1), California (1). New Jersey is an EEOC deferral state, which extends the federal Title VII / ADA / ADEA filing deadline from 180 to 300 days. Browse state-specific employment rulings for jurisdictional patterns. New Jersey rulings, Florida rulings, Minnesota rulings and California rulings.
These published opinions sit within the hospitality sector, where wage theft, tip-pooling violations, and sexual-harassment claims are common.
Opinion Outcomes
Opinion Stages
6 analyzed opinions have a classified procedural stage.
What do these stages mean?
- Appeal
- A higher court reviewing an earlier decision. Many published opinions come from this stage, after a lot has already happened in the case.
- Motion to dismiss
- An early request — usually by the employer — to throw the case out before any evidence is gathered.
- Other rulings
- Procedural decisions and orders that do not fit the main stages above.
Published federal-court opinions only — most workplace disputes are resolved privately. This is not anyone’s odds, and not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Facing something similar? Check your rights →
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Hospitality & Food Service employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.