Jack v. All-Rite Paving Contractors, Inc.
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- 710 Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- consent decree
- State
- Florida
- Circuit
- Eleventh Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The Court approved a joint settlement of Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) claims between the plaintiffs and defendant All-Rite Paving Contractors, Inc., and dismissed the case with prejudice.
What This Ruling Means
Jack v. All-Rite Paving Contractors, Inc. — Case Summary
What Happened
Jack and other workers sued All-Rite Paving Contractors, Inc., claiming the company failed to pay them properly under federal wage laws. This type of case is called wage theft—when employers don't pay workers the full amount they're legally owed.
What the Court Decided
The court approved a settlement agreement between the workers and the company. Both sides agreed to end the lawsuit, and the case was dismissed. The court documents don't report the specific dollar amount the company agreed to pay.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case reinforces that workers have legal protections under federal wage laws. Even when a case doesn't go to trial, settlements show that courts take wage theft seriously. If you believe your employer hasn't paid you correctly, you may have the right to take legal action. Keep records of your hours and pay to protect yourself.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
More Rulings in This Case
Other orders and opinions in Jack from the same court.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.