Skip to main content

Jack v. All-Rite Paving Contractors, Inc.

S.D. Fla.August 25, 2025No. 0:24-cv-61261
Plaintiff WinCity Newark Glass Co.$6,200.14 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
710 Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment
State
Florida

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The Union's petition to confirm the arbitration award against Newark Glass was granted. The court confirmed the arbitral panel's finding that Newark Glass violated the collective bargaining agreement by failing to register a job site and using non-union workers, and awarded attorneys' fees and costs to the Union.

What This Ruling Means

**Union Wins Case Against Company That Used Non-Union Workers** This case involved a dispute between a union and Newark Glass Co. over violations of their collective bargaining agreement. The union claimed that Newark Glass broke their contract by failing to properly register a work site and using non-union workers instead of union members as required by their agreement. The matter went to arbitration, where a panel of arbitrators ruled in favor of the union. When Newark Glass refused to pay, the union asked the court to enforce the arbitration decision. The court agreed and confirmed the arbitrators' ruling, ordering Newark Glass to pay $6,200.14 in damages plus the union's legal fees and costs. **What This Means for Workers:** This ruling reinforces that collective bargaining agreements are legally binding contracts that employers must follow. When companies try to cut costs by using non-union workers in violation of their union contracts, they can be held accountable and forced to pay damages. The decision also shows that arbitration awards in labor disputes will be enforced by courts, giving unions and workers a reliable way to ensure their contractual rights are protected when employers violate their agreements.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.