Perry v. Kansas Star Casino, LLC
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- consent decree
- State
- Kansas
- Circuit
- Tenth Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
Court approved a $981,000 FLSA settlement on behalf of 507 table games dealers in a tip-pooling collective action. Defendants agreed to cease the challenged tip-pooling practice, pay settlement amounts averaging $1,225 per member, and cover payroll taxes, with plaintiff's counsel awarded $327,000 in fees.
What This Ruling Means
Perry v. Kansas Star Casino Settlement Summary
What Happened
More than 500 table games dealers at Kansas Star Casino claimed the casino was illegally taking their tips through a tip-pooling arrangement. The workers said this practice violated federal wage laws designed to protect their earnings.
What the Court Decided
The court approved a settlement worth $981,000. The casino agreed to stop the disputed tip-pooling practice immediately. Each of the 507 affected dealers will receive an average payment of $1,225. The casino will also cover all payroll taxes owed on these payments. The court awarded an additional $327,000 to the workers' lawyers to cover legal costs.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case reinforces that workers have the right to keep their tips. Even large employers cannot implement tip-pooling systems that violate federal wage laws. The settlement shows that when workers challenge improper wage practices together, they can win significant compensation and force employers to change illegal policies. If you believe your tips are being handled improperly, you may have legal options available.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.