Skip to main content

HECKE v. COMMISSIONER OF INDIANA POLICE DEPARTMENT

S.D. Ind.September 16, 2025No. 1:23-cv-00451
SettlementBucks Fresh Produce, LLC$605,040 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
440 Civil Rights: Other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
consent decree
State
Indiana

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

Defendants agreed to settle outstanding produce payment obligations under PACA for $605,040.00 through a settlement agreement entered on December 11, 2018, with installment payments and secured by a deed of trust on real property.

What This Ruling Means

**Employment Dispute Over Unpaid Produce Payments Settles for $605,000** This case involved a contract dispute between workers and Bucks Fresh Produce, LLC over unpaid obligations related to produce payments. The workers claimed the company failed to meet its payment responsibilities under federal produce regulations (PACA), which protect those in the produce industry supply chain. Rather than go to trial, both sides reached a settlement agreement in December 2018. Under the settlement, Bucks Fresh Produce agreed to pay $605,040 to resolve the outstanding payment obligations. The company will make installment payments over time, and the agreement is secured by a deed of trust on the company's real property, meaning if they don't pay, the workers have a claim on the property. This case matters for workers because it shows that employees and contractors in specialized industries like produce distribution have legal protections when employers don't pay what they owe. The federal PACA law specifically helps ensure people get paid in produce transactions. Workers should know that when employers breach payment contracts, legal action can result in substantial settlements, and courts can require companies to secure those payments with their property to ensure workers actually get paid.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.