Skip to main content

Hernandez v. Fu Long Food Product Inc.

E.D.N.Y.September 16, 2025No. 1:24-cv-08391
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
710 Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The court granted the defendant's motion to dismiss in part, dismissing the plaintiff's claim under 15 USC § 1692g for lack of standing, while denying the motion as to the claim under 15 USC § 1692e, which was allowed to proceed.

What This Ruling Means

**Worker Loses Part of Case Against Food Company Over Wage Collection Practices** A worker named Hernandez filed a lawsuit against Fu Long Food Product Inc., claiming the company violated federal laws when trying to collect unpaid wages or debts from employees. The case involved how the company communicated with workers about money they allegedly owed. The court made a split decision on Hernandez's claims. The judge dismissed one part of the lawsuit, ruling that Hernandez couldn't prove they had the legal right to sue under a specific federal debt collection law (15 USC § 1692g). However, the court allowed another claim to move forward under a different part of the same law (15 USC § 1692e), which deals with misleading or deceptive practices in debt collection. **What This Means for Workers:** This case highlights that workers have some protection when employers or their representatives try to collect debts, but proving violations can be challenging. Workers should know that federal laws regulate how companies can communicate about debts, including wage-related debts. If an employer uses misleading tactics when trying to collect money from workers, there may be legal remedies available. However, workers need to meet specific legal requirements to successfully challenge these practices in court.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.