Skip to main content

Johnson v. Little

D. Colo.August 22, 2025No. 1:24-cv-01447
Plaintiff WinTexas Southmost College District$934,748.33 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
442 Civil Rights: Jobs
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
jury verdict

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

Plaintiff Tercero prevailed on her breach-of-contract claim against Texas Southmost College District. The court awarded her $674,878.66 in lost earnings and benefits, plus $259,869.67 in attorney's fees, and prejudgment interest at 5% per annum from the date suit was filed.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened:** Tercero, an employee at Texas Southmost College District, sued her employer claiming they broke the terms of her employment contract. The specific details of how the contract was violated aren't provided, but the case centered on the college district failing to honor their employment agreement with her. **What the Court Decided:** The court ruled in favor of Tercero, finding that the college district did indeed breach her employment contract. The judge awarded her substantial compensation totaling $934,748.33. This included $674,878.66 for lost wages and benefits she should have received, plus $259,869.67 to cover her attorney's fees. The court also added 5% annual interest on the damages starting from when she first filed the lawsuit. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This case demonstrates that employers must honor the terms of employment contracts they sign with workers. When employers break these agreements, they can face significant financial consequences. The large award shows courts take contract violations seriously and will compensate workers for lost income and benefits. Importantly, the court also made the employer pay the employee's legal fees, which helps workers pursue legitimate claims without bearing the full cost of litigation.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.