Ohio court held that FMLA violations do not support a state law wrongful discharge claim based on public policy.
Employer and employee—Ohio does not recognize a cause of action for wrongful discharge in violation of public policy when the cause of action is based solely on a discharge in violation of the federal Family and Medical Leave Act, Section 2601 et seq., Title 29, U.S.Code.
Wiles v. Medina Auto Parts: FMLA and Wrongful Termination
This case involved an employee who claimed Medina Auto Parts wrongfully fired them for taking time off under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA). The FMLA is a federal law that allows eligible workers to take unpaid leave for serious health conditions or to care for family members without losing their jobs.
The employee sued the company in Ohio state court, arguing they were wrongfully terminated in violation of public policy. They claimed the firing violated both federal FMLA protections and Ohio's general prohibition against firing employees for reasons that harm the public good.
The Ohio court ruled against the employee, deciding that workers cannot bring a state wrongful termination lawsuit based solely on FMLA violations. The court determined that Ohio does not recognize this type of state claim when it's only supported by federal FMLA violations.
What this means for workers: If your employer violates your FMLA rights in Ohio, you'll need to pursue your case under federal law rather than state wrongful termination claims. This doesn't eliminate your protections—the FMLA still applies—but it limits which courts and legal theories you can use when seeking justice for FMLA violations.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.