Skip to main content

Baltimore Ravens, Inc. v. Self-Insuring Emp. Evaluation Bd.

OhioMarch 27, 2002No. 2000-1744Cited 6 times
Plaintiff WinBaltimore Ravens, Inc.$50,000 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Alice Robie Resnick, J.
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The Ohio Supreme Court affirmed that the Self-Insuring Employers Evaluation Board's disciplinary orders are not subject to judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act, effectively upholding the board's jurisdiction and the $50,000 fine against Baltimore Ravens for consistently refusing to pay workers' compensation benefits.

Excerpt

Workers' compensation—Disciplinary orders issued by the Self-Insuring Employers Evaluation Board pursuant to R.C. 4123.352(C) are not subject to judicial review under R.C. 119.12 of the Administrative Procedure Act.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** The Baltimore Ravens football team was fined $50,000 by Ohio's Self-Insuring Employers Evaluation Board for repeatedly refusing to pay workers' compensation benefits to their employees. The Ravens challenged this fine in court, arguing that the board didn't have the authority to discipline them and that they should be able to appeal the board's decision through Ohio's regular administrative appeals process. **What the Court Decided** The Ohio Supreme Court sided against the Ravens. The court ruled that the Self-Insuring Employers Evaluation Board has the legal authority to issue disciplinary orders and fines against employers who don't properly handle workers' compensation claims. The court also decided that employers cannot challenge these disciplinary decisions through the state's standard administrative appeals process. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling strengthens protections for injured workers by confirming that Ohio's workers' compensation oversight board has real enforcement power. When employers try to avoid paying legitimate workers' compensation claims, the state board can impose significant financial penalties without employers being able to easily appeal those punishments. This gives the board more teeth to ensure employers follow workers' compensation laws and pay benefits when workers get hurt on the job.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.