Skip to main content

Blackett v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America

D. Md.September 30, 2025No. 8:24-cv-02259
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationRetaliationHarassmentHostile Work Environment

Outcome

The court granted defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's employment discrimination and retaliation claims under judicial estoppel doctrine because plaintiff failed to disclose her claims against the employer in her bankruptcy filing, though dismissal was without prejudice.

What This Ruling Means

**Blackett v. UNUM Life Insurance Company Case Summary** **What Happened:** Shayla Blackett sued her former employer, KSL Associate Group (doing business as Sagewood at Daybreak), claiming workplace discrimination, retaliation, and harassment that created a hostile work environment. However, during her lawsuit, it came to light that Blackett had previously filed for bankruptcy but failed to mention her potential employment claims against her employer in that bankruptcy case. **What the Court Decided:** The court dismissed Blackett's case using a legal principle called "judicial estoppel." Essentially, the court said that because Blackett didn't tell the bankruptcy court about her employment claims (which could have been valuable assets), she couldn't pursue those same claims now. However, the dismissal was "without prejudice," meaning she might be able to refile the case if she can address the bankruptcy disclosure issue. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This case highlights a critical requirement for workers: if you file for bankruptcy, you must disclose ALL potential legal claims against employers, even if you haven't filed them yet. Failing to do so can result in losing your right to pursue workplace discrimination or harassment claims later. Workers should consult with both bankruptcy and employment attorneys to ensure proper disclosure of all potential assets and claims.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.