No specific laws identified for this ruling.
The court approved a Fair Labor Standards Act settlement agreement between employee Ramos and employer Digital Prosthodontics, LLC, awarding $26,500 in total compensation ($6,600 for wages and liquidated damages, $6,900 for severance, and $13,000 for attorneys' fees and costs) to resolve overtime pay claims.
Jose Ramos v. Digital Prosthodontics, LLC Settlement Summary
What Happened
Jose Ramos, an employee at Digital Prosthodontics, LLC, filed a court case claiming the company failed to pay him overtime wages he was legally owed. Overtime pay is the extra money workers must receive when they work more than 40 hours per week, as required by federal law.
What the Court Decided
The court approved a settlement agreement between Ramos and the company. Digital Prosthodontics agreed to pay Ramos a total of $26,500. This included $6,600 for unpaid wages and additional compensation, $6,900 for severance pay, and $13,000 to cover his legal costs and attorney fees.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case reinforces that employers must follow federal overtime rules—workers have the right to challenge wage theft in court. The settlement shows that when workers bring legitimate overtime claims, they can recover not just missing pay but also legal fees, making it more affordable to fight for what they're owed. It also demonstrates that courts take these violations seriously enough to approve settlements that fully compensate workers for their losses.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.