Skip to main content

R. Alexander Acosta, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Quality Granite and Cabinetry, LLC and Christopher Bouchard

D.N.H.October 2, 2018No. 18-cv-274-JD
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The court denied the defendants' motion to dismiss the Secretary of Labor's FLSA claims for minimum wage and overtime violations, finding that the Secretary's allegations using average hours worked combined with actual payment amounts stated plausible claims for relief.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** The U.S. Department of Labor sued Quality Granite and Cabinetry, LLC and its owner Christopher Bouchard for allegedly violating wage laws. The Labor Department claimed the company failed to pay workers proper minimum wage and overtime compensation as required under federal law. The company tried to get the case thrown out of court before it could proceed to trial, arguing that the government's claims were insufficient. **What the Court Decided** The court refused to dismiss the case, allowing the Labor Department's lawsuit to move forward. The judge found that the government had provided enough evidence to support their claims. Specifically, the court determined that showing workers' average hours combined with their actual pay amounts was sufficient to demonstrate potential wage violations. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling reinforces that the government can pursue wage theft cases even when employers challenge the sufficiency of the evidence early in the process. It shows courts will allow these cases to proceed when there's reasonable evidence of underpayment. For workers, this demonstrates that federal agencies can effectively advocate for proper wages and overtime pay, and that employers can't easily escape accountability by claiming insufficient proof.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.