Skip to main content

Evans v. A Plus Tree

D. UtahOctober 9, 2025No. 2:24-cv-00459
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss
State
Utah

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Court screened plaintiff's complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and found it fails to state a claim because defendants are private parties without alleged state action required for § 1983 claims. Complaint not served; plaintiff given leave to file amended complaint by December 20, 2019, or face dismissal as frivolous.

What This Ruling Means

**Evans v. A Plus Tree Employment Case Dismissed** Evans filed a lawsuit against A Plus Tree and the Tacoma News Tribune claiming his employment rights were violated. He tried to sue under a federal civil rights law that allows people to seek damages when government officials violate their constitutional rights. The court dismissed Evans' case before it even got started. The judge found that Evans was suing private companies, not government agencies or officials. The federal law he relied on only applies when government employees or agencies violate someone's rights - it doesn't cover disputes with private employers. Since A Plus Tree and the Tacoma News Tribune are private businesses, this particular law couldn't be used against them. The court gave Evans until December 20, 2019, to file a new complaint that properly states a legal claim, or his case would be permanently dismissed. This case highlights an important distinction for workers: different laws apply depending on whether you work for the government or a private company. Federal civil rights laws that cover government employment don't automatically extend to private workplaces. Workers facing employment issues need to understand which specific laws protect them based on their type of employer.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.