Skip to main content

Shakoor-Delgado

S.D. Cal.October 15, 2025No. 3:24-cv-01811
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
710 Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to compel

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The court granted in part and denied as moot in part the defendants' motion to compel, ordering plaintiffs to disclose additional expert compensation information.

What This Ruling Means

**Court Orders Limited Information Sharing in Wage Theft Case** This case involves workers who sued Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson claiming wage theft - meaning they believe the companies failed to pay them wages they were legally owed. The workers are still fighting their main case in court. The court recently made a decision about a side issue during the legal process. The companies asked the judge to force the workers to reveal how much they're paying their expert witnesses (specialists who will testify to support the workers' case). The court granted part of this request, meaning the workers must share some information about expert witness payments, but the judge didn't require them to disclose everything the companies wanted. This ruling doesn't resolve whether the workers actually experienced wage theft - that decision comes later. It's simply about what information each side must share during the legal process before trial. **What this means for workers:** This case shows that wage theft lawsuits against large companies can be lengthy and involve many procedural battles before reaching the main issues. Workers considering similar claims should be prepared for a complex legal process where companies may challenge various aspects of how the case proceeds, not just the underlying wage theft allegations.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.