Skip to main content

Court Ruling — C.D. Cal, 2025 #10711054

C.D. Cal.October 20, 2025No. 2:25-cv-09229
Mixed ResultMilliman, Inc.
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The court denied plaintiff's motion to modify the class definition as moot, granted in part and denied in part defendant's motion for partial summary judgment and decertification, and granted motions to seal. The court found class-wide standing exists for both the inaccuracy and failure to reinvestigate claims under the FCRA.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** Workers at Milliman, Inc. brought a class action lawsuit claiming the company violated wage and hour laws and the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). The dispute centered on allegations that Milliman failed to pay workers properly and had problems with how they handled background checks - either providing inaccurate information or failing to properly reinvestigate when workers disputed their background check results. **What the Court Decided** The court issued a mixed ruling that was partially favorable to both sides. The judge allowed the workers to proceed as a group (class action) for their background check claims, finding that enough workers were affected similarly to justify handling their cases together. However, the court also granted some of the company's requests to limit parts of the case. The judge also approved requests to keep certain case documents sealed from public view. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling is significant because it allows workers to band together when challenging employer background check practices. When companies provide wrong information in background checks or fail to properly investigate worker disputes, affected employees can potentially join forces in a class action lawsuit rather than fighting alone. This gives workers more leverage and makes it more practical to pursue these types of claims against large employers.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.