Skip to main content

Myers

E.D. Mo.November 18, 2025No. 4:25-cv-00815
Plaintiff WinRegions Security Services, Inc.$98,306.25 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

Plaintiff David Thompson prevailed in his FLSA wage claim against Regions Security Services, Inc. The court approved the magistrate judge's recommendation and awarded Thompson $94,627.50 in attorney's fees, $2,820 in taxable costs, and $858.75 in non-taxable costs, for a total of $98,306.25.

What This Ruling Means

**Security Guard Wins Wage Theft Case Against Employer** David Thompson, a security guard, sued his former employer Regions Security Services, Inc. for wage theft under federal labor law. Thompson claimed the company failed to pay him proper wages he was legally owed during his employment. The court ruled in Thompson's favor, finding that Regions Security Services had indeed violated wage laws. The company was ordered to pay Thompson a total of $98,306.25. This amount included $94,627.50 to cover Thompson's attorney's fees and $3,678.75 for court costs. This case is significant for workers because it shows that employees can successfully fight back against wage theft and recover not just their stolen wages, but also their legal costs. When employers illegally withhold pay from workers, federal law allows courts to make the company pay the employee's attorney's fees on top of the owed wages. This means workers don't have to worry about expensive legal bills preventing them from seeking justice. The substantial attorney's fee award in this case demonstrates that employers who steal wages may face significant financial consequences beyond just paying back what they owe.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.