Court Ruling — C.D. Cal, 2025 #10747266

**Court Rules Invoice Terms Don't Override Original Agreement** This case involved a dispute between Machinery Marketing International and another party over contract terms. The key issue was whether a forum-selection clause (a rule about which court must handle any disputes) that appeared on an invoice could become part of their original agreement. The Michigan Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the plaintiff. The court found that when one party adds new terms to an invoice after the main contract details have already been agreed upon, those added terms don't automatically become part of the deal. Since the forum-selection clause was included unilaterally (by one side only) on the invoice sent after the essential agreement was reached, it wasn't considered part of the binding contract under commercial law. **What This Means for Workers:** This ruling protects people from having surprise contract terms imposed on them after they've already made an agreement. It's particularly important for workers because it prevents employers or companies from sneaking in new rules or restrictions through paperwork sent after the main deal is done. The decision reinforces that both parties must agree to contract terms upfront – you can't be bound by conditions you never actually accepted.