Skip to main content

Donna McCammon et al v. Surrey Propco LLC

S.D.N.Y.October 14, 2025No. 1:25-cv-03292
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
442 Civil Rights: Jobs
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage TheftRetaliation

Outcome

The court affirmed the trial court's order denying the employer's motion to compel arbitration of the plaintiff's individual PAGA claim and to dismiss her non-individual PAGA claim, holding that the arbitration agreement required arbitration of both individual and non-individual PAGA claims.

What This Ruling Means

**Workers Win Right to Sue in Court Over Wage Theft Claims** This case involved workers from Elite Show Services who claimed their employer stole wages and retaliated against them for complaining. The workers sued under California's Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA), which allows employees to sue on behalf of themselves and other workers for labor law violations. The employer tried to force the workers into private arbitration instead of allowing them to go to court. The company pointed to an arbitration agreement that employees had signed, arguing it covered all types of PAGA claims. The court rejected the employer's argument and ruled that the workers could proceed with their lawsuit in court. The judge found that while the arbitration agreement mentioned PAGA claims, it didn't properly cover all aspects of the workers' case under the law. This decision matters because it protects workers' ability to hold employers accountable through the court system rather than being forced into private arbitration. PAGA lawsuits are often more powerful than individual claims because they can address widespread workplace violations affecting many employees. When workers can take these cases to court instead of arbitration, they typically have better chances of success and can achieve broader remedies that help other workers too.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.