Skip to main content

Griffin Energy Law, PLLC v. Robert D. Billingsley; Freeda Billingsley; And James M. Davis, Jr.

Tex. App.—11th Dist.March 5, 2026No. 11-24-00174-CV
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Real estate
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss
Circuit
10th Circuit

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

Court granted plaintiff employer's temporary restraining order against former executive to prevent him from working for competing business, finding substantial likelihood of success on breach of restrictive covenant claims, but denied TRO against the LLC entity itself.

What This Ruling Means

**Court Stops Former Executive from Working for Competitor** This case involved a dispute between Griffin Energy Law and several former employees, including executive David Schupmann, who left to work for a competing roofing company called Fortis. Griffin Energy claimed that Schupmann was violating a non-compete agreement he had signed while employed with them, which prohibited him from working in management or sales and marketing roles for competing businesses. The court sided with Griffin Energy and issued an emergency temporary restraining order. This legal order immediately prevented Schupmann from working in any managerial, sales, or marketing position at the competing roofing company. The court found that the non-compete agreement was valid and that Schupmann was breaking the terms of his contract. **What this means for workers:** This ruling reinforces that non-compete agreements can be legally enforced, even in emergency situations. If you sign a non-compete clause as part of your employment contract, courts may prevent you from taking certain jobs with competitors, even temporarily. Workers should carefully read and understand any non-compete agreements before signing them, as they can significantly limit future job opportunities. Consider consulting with an employment attorney if you have questions about these restrictions.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.