Skip to main content

Glenn Whiting v. City of Athens, Tenn.

6th CircuitMarch 13, 2026No. 25-5424
Plaintiff WinP.M. MacKay & Sons, Inc.$62,393.9 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Jane Branstetter Stranch; John K. Bush; Eric E. Murphy
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
trial verdict

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

Plaintiff Jordan prevailed on breach of contract claims against MacKay and USF&G, recovering $62,393.90 for unpaid work due to MacKay's consistent late payments and ultimate non-payment. The court found MacKay peremptorily breached the subcontract, absolving Jordan of further performance obligations.

What This Ruling Means

**Court Rules in Favor of Worker in Payment Dispute** This case involved a payment dispute between a worker named Jordan and their employer, P.M. MacKay & Sons, Inc. Jordan had been working under a subcontract arrangement but wasn't getting paid on time. MacKay consistently made late payments and eventually stopped paying Jordan altogether for work that had already been completed. The federal appeals court sided with Jordan, ruling that MacKay had broken their contract by failing to make payments as agreed. The court awarded Jordan $62,393.90 to cover the unpaid work. The judge found that MacKay's failure to pay was so serious that it completely violated the contract, which meant Jordan was no longer required to continue working for the company. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This ruling reinforces that employers must honor their payment agreements. When employers consistently pay late or stop paying altogether, workers have legal options to recover their unpaid wages. The court's decision shows that serious payment violations can release workers from their obligations to continue working while still allowing them to collect what they're owed. Workers facing similar payment issues should document late or missing payments as potential evidence of contract violations.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.