Skip to main content

LISA R. HICKMAN v. JORDAN TURLEY, ANDY SIMMONS, RILEY BREEDLOVE, SHERIFF EMPLOYEE MOORE, CHRIS JACKSON, and GREGG MARTIN

E.D. Okla.February 20, 2026No. 6:24-cv-00407
DismissedMuskogee County Sheriff's Office
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Civil Rights: Other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

RetaliationFailure to AccommodateHostile Work Environment

Outcome

The Court granted defendants' motions to dismiss plaintiff's First Amended Complaint for failure to state plausible claims under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), finding insufficient factual allegations to support claims under the U.S. Constitution, federal law, and tribal law.

What This Ruling Means

**Case Summary: Hickman v. Turley and Others** Lisa Hickman filed a civil rights lawsuit against several employees at a Sheriff's Office, including Jordan Turley, Andy Simmons, Riley Breedlove, an employee named Moore, Chris Jackson, and Gregg Martin. The case appears to involve allegations that these sheriff's office workers violated Hickman's civil rights in some way, though the specific details of what happened are not provided in the available court records. **The Court's Decision** The court records indicate this case is still pending or the final outcome has not been determined yet. The case was filed in February 2026 and remains unresolved, with no damages reported at this time. **What This Means for Workers** While the specific outcome isn't known yet, this case highlights an important right for workers: the ability to file civil rights lawsuits against government employers and their employees when constitutional violations occur. Workers in government jobs, including law enforcement agencies, are protected by federal civil rights laws. If supervisors or coworkers violate these rights, employees can seek legal remedies through the court system, even against multiple defendants simultaneously.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.