Skip to main content

Winston v. Monahan

D.D.C.March 26, 2026No. Civil Action No. 2023-2123
Plaintiff WinStealth Construction US, Inc.$89,859.43 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Judge Loren L. AliKhan
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
default judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The court granted in part and denied in part plaintiff's motion for default judgment, awarding $89,859.43 in damages for FLSA violations including unpaid minimum wages, unpaid overtime wages, and liquidated damages, but reducing the amount from plaintiff's requested $109,367.14 due to application of federal minimum wage rates rather than state rates.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** Worker Winston sued his former employer, Stealth Construction US, Inc., claiming the company failed to pay him proper wages. Winston argued that the construction company violated federal wage laws by not paying minimum wage for all hours worked and failing to pay overtime when he worked more than 40 hours per week. **What the Court Decided** The court sided with Winston and ordered Stealth Construction to pay him $89,859.43 in damages. This amount covered unpaid minimum wages, unpaid overtime wages, and additional penalty damages under federal law. However, the court awarded less than the $109,367.14 Winston originally requested because it applied federal minimum wage rates instead of higher state minimum wage rates in its calculations. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling reinforces that employers must follow federal wage and hour laws, including paying at least minimum wage for all hours worked and overtime pay for hours exceeding 40 per week. Workers who experience wage theft can successfully recover not only their unpaid wages but also additional penalty damages. The case shows that even when employers don't respond to lawsuits, courts will still carefully review wage claims and ensure workers receive appropriate compensation under federal law.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.