Skip to main content

Lora Johnson v. City Council

La. Ct. App.March 30, 2026No. 2025-CA-0560
RemandedCity Council
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Chief Judge Roland L. Belsome; Judge Joy Cossich Lobrano; Judge Rosemary Ledet
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The court granted the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and remanded the case for further proceedings, finding that the ALJ erred in discounting the plaintiff's subjective symptom testimony regarding his anxiety and depression without clear and convincing reasons.

What This Ruling Means

I notice that the case information you've provided is incomplete. The excerpt section is empty, the court name appears to be garbled ("lactapp"), the outcome is listed as unknown, and there are no details about what actually happened in the case or what the court decided. To write a proper summary for workers, I would need: - The actual facts of the dispute between Lora Johnson and the City Council - What employment law issues were involved - The court's ruling and reasoning - Any relevant details from the court's decision Could you please provide the complete case details or court excerpt? Once I have the full information about what happened in this employment case and how the court ruled, I'll be happy to write a clear, plain-English summary that explains what this means for workers.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Similar Rulings

Harry P. Mendoza v. City of New Orleans and Municipal Police Employees Retirement System
La. Ct. App.Nov 2025
Defendant Win
Johnny Cousain v. Smitty&39;s Supply, Inc. and National Union Fire Insurance Company
La. Ct. App.Sep 2025
Mixed Result
Daniel Russo and Reilly Cavanaugh Versus Onpath Federal Credit Union
La. Ct. App.May 2024
Defendant Win
Byron R. Poydras and Alicia R. Poydras, Individually and on Behalf of Their Son, Myles Christopher Poydras, Mason J. Poydras and Milan a Poydras Versus First Student, Inc., First Student of Orleans, LLC, First Student Management, LLC, Old Republic Insurance Company, Old Republic General Insurance Corporation, National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pc, Daniel Mosely (a/K/A Danny Mosely), Christopher Anderson, Jason Thomas, and Ira Green
La. Ct. App.May 2024
Defendant Win
Byron R. Poydras and Alicia R. Poydras, Individually and on Behalf of Their Son, Myles Christopher Poydras, Mason J. Poydras and Milan a Poydras Versus First Student, Inc., First Student of Orleans, LLC, First Student Management, LLC, Old Republic Insurance Company, Old Republic General Insurance Corporation, National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pc, Daniel Mosely (a/K/A Danny Mosely), Christopher Anderson, Jason Thomas, and Ira Green
La. Ct. App.May 2024
Defendant Win
Read Full OpinionMore City Council RulingsAll Rulings

Browse Related

More government & public sector employer cases

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

Check My RightsLearn the Basics

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.