Santana v. Studebaker Health Care Center
Case Details
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Published
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- appeal
- State
- California
- Circuit
- 9th Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
Appellate court reversed the trial court's denial of arbitration and held that Studebaker's arbitration agreement with employee Santana was valid and enforceable, requiring wage-and-hour and PAGA claims to be arbitrated rather than litigated in court.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.