Skip to main content

Rodelmiro Estrada-Castillo v. Eric Holder, Jr.

9th CircuitOctober 25, 2013No. 11-72668
Defendant WinEric Holder, Jr
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Fisher, Gould, Bybee
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Ninth Circuit denied the petitioner's petition for review of the BIA's order denying his motion to reconsider and reopen removal proceedings based on ineffective assistance of counsel claims.

What This Ruling Means

**Rodelmiro Estrada-Castillo v. Eric Holder, Jr. - Employment Case Summary** **What Happened:** Rodelmiro Estrada-Castillo filed a case against Eric Holder Jr., who was serving as U.S. Attorney General at the time. While initially appearing to involve employment law claims against the Department of Justice, the available information suggests this case actually dealt with immigration or administrative law matters rather than traditional workplace issues like discrimination or wrongful termination. **What the Court Decided:** Based on the limited information available, the specific outcome of this case is not clearly documented. The case was filed in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in 2013, but the final ruling details are not provided in the available records. **Why This Matters for Workers:** Without complete case details, it's difficult to draw specific lessons for workers. However, this case serves as a reminder that federal employees and those dealing with government agencies have legal avenues to challenge decisions, even when cases involve complex administrative or immigration issues rather than straightforward employment disputes. Workers should understand that employment-related cases can sometimes intersect with other areas of law, requiring careful legal analysis to determine the appropriate claims and procedures.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.