Khan v. Ibr, Inc.
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Judge Emmet G. Sullivan
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Published
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- default judgment
- State
- District of Columbia
- Circuit
- D.C. Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
Plaintiff Khan prevailed on her default judgment motion against her employer IBR, Inc. and owner Toha Islam for wage and hour violations under the FLSA, DCMWA, and DCWPCL. The court awarded damages for unpaid overtime wages, liquidated damages, and attorneys' fees.
What This Ruling Means
Khan v. IBR, Inc. — Plain English Summary
What Happened
Khan, an employee at IBR, Inc., claimed her employer failed to pay her proper wages, particularly overtime pay. She filed a lawsuit against the company and its owner, Toha Islam, accusing them of wage theft—keeping money that employees had legally earned.
What the Court Decided
The court ruled in Khan's favor. Since the employer didn't properly respond to the case, the judge entered a default judgment against IBR, Inc. and Toha Islam. The court ordered them to pay Khan $18,619.65 in damages. This money covered unpaid overtime wages she should have received, additional damages as punishment for the violation, and fees for her attorney who handled the case.
Why This Matters for Workers
This ruling reinforces that employers must pay employees for all hours worked, including overtime. Workers who aren't paid correctly have legal options and can recover not just missing wages but also extra damages and attorney fees. The decision sends a message that wage theft has real consequences for employers who violate payment laws.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.