No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Plaintiff's workers' compensation claim was found timely filed within two years of last medical payment regardless of Virginia location. Court upheld Industrial Commission's findings of total disability and rejected employer's offered part-time position as make-work.
1. Workers' Compensation — timeliness of claim — last medical payment — foreign jurisdiction A workers' compensation claim was timely filed because it was within two years of the last medical compensation paid by defendants, even though the payment was to medical providers in Virginia. Nothing in the statutory definition of medical compensation limits the location to North Carolina, nor is there an exception Page 423 for the employer's presumption that the claim will be in a foreign jurisdiction. N.C.G.S. § 97-24 . 2. Workers' Compensation — timeliness of claim — short-term disability payments — not "other compensation" Short-term disability benefits paid in lieu of workers' compensation were not paid pursuant to the Workers' Compensation Act, and did not qualify as "other compensation" for timeliness purposes under N.C.G.S. § 97-24 . 3. Workers' Compensation — appeal — failure to assign error — findings binding Failure to assign error in a workers' compensation case to findings about plaintiff's medical history and incapacity for employment meant that those findings were binding on appeal. The Industrial Commission's conclusion that plaintiff is totally disabled was upheld. 4. Workers' Compensation — offered part-time employment — make-work The evidence in a workers' compensation case supported the finding that a part-time position offered to plaintiff was make-work and did not constitute other employment as defined by N.C.G.S. § 97-2 (9). 5. Workers' Compensation — medical care — effectiveness The Industrial Commission did not err in a workers' compe
The Dispute
A Bank of America employee, McGhee, filed a workers' compensation claim for a workplace injury. The bank argued that McGhee had waited too long to file the claim and that it was now past the legal deadline. The bank also claimed that McGhee wasn't totally disabled because they had offered him a part-time position. McGhee had received medical payments for his injury, but some of those payments went to doctors in Virginia rather than North Carolina.
The Court's Decision
The court ruled in McGhee's favor on both issues. First, they decided his claim was filed on time because it came within two years of the last medical payment the bank made for his injury - even though that payment went to Virginia doctors. The court said the law doesn't require medical payments to stay within North Carolina. Second, the court found that McGhee was indeed totally disabled and that the part-time job the bank offered was essentially "make-work" that didn't constitute real employment.
What This Means for Workers
This ruling protects workers in two important ways: you don't lose your right to file a workers' compensation claim just because you received medical treatment in another state, and employers can't avoid paying full disability benefits by offering token part-time positions that aren't genuine work opportunities.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Workers' Compensation — Causation — fibromyalgia — doctor's opinion testimony The Court of Appeals erred in concluding that competent evidence was presented to support the Industrial Commission's findings of fact with regard to the cause of plaintiff-employee's fibromyalgia based solely on the…
1. Workers' Compensation — Seagraves test — injured employee's right to continuing benefits — termination for misconduct Our Supreme Court adopts the Seagraves , 123 N.C. App. 228 (2003), test for determining an injured employee's right to continuing workers' compensation benefits after being…
1. Workers' Compensation — sale of business — continuing jurisdiction of Industrial Commission An employer who had sold its paper mill and workers' compensation liabilities after an employee's work-related accident continued to be subject to the jurisdiction of the Industrial Commission with regard…
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.