No specific laws identified for this ruling.
The Kentucky Supreme Court affirmed summary judgment for defendants Labor Ready and Hudson, holding that a temporary employee and a permanent employee working on the same job are co-employees under workers' compensation law, thus shielding the temporary labor service and its employee from tort liability.
Labor Ready, Inc. v. Johnston
This case involved a workplace injury where a permanent employee was hurt while working alongside a temporary worker provided by Labor Ready, a temp agency. The injured permanent employee sued both Labor Ready and the temp worker directly, claiming they caused his injury through negligence.
The Kentucky Supreme Court ruled against the injured worker. The court decided that when temporary employees and permanent employees work together at the same job site, they are considered "co-employees" under workers' compensation law. This legal status protects both the temp agency and the temporary worker from being sued directly for workplace injuries.
What this means for workers: If you're injured at work while working with temporary employees (or if you're a temp worker involved in someone else's injury), you generally cannot sue the temp agency or temp workers directly. Instead, you must rely on workers' compensation benefits for your injuries. This ruling limits your ability to seek additional money damages through lawsuits, even if you believe the temporary worker or agency was negligent. The decision strengthens legal protections for temp agencies and their workers but may limit options for injured employees seeking full compensation.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.