Skip to main content

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. FLC & Bros. Rebel, Inc.

W.D. Va.June 29, 1987No. 86-0040-HCited 2 times
Plaintiff WinFLC & Brothers Rebel, Inc.$14,250 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Michael
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
bench trial

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationRetaliationHarassmentWrongful Termination

Outcome

The court found that FLC discriminated against Christina Besares on the basis of sex by discharging her in retaliation for complaining about sexual harassment by her supervisor. The employer's stated reason for discharge was pretextual.

What This Ruling Means

# Court Ruling Summary: EEOC v. FLC & Bros. Rebel, Inc. ## What Happened Christina Besares worked at FLC & Brothers Rebel, Inc., where she experienced sexual harassment from her supervisor. When she complained about this harassment, the company fired her. The company claimed she was terminated for other reasons, but the court investigated whether this explanation was genuine. ## What the Court Decided The court found that FLC & Brothers Rebel, Inc. discriminated against Besares based on her sex and fired her in retaliation for reporting sexual harassment. The judge determined the company's stated reason for firing her was false. The court ordered the employer to pay Besares $14,250 in damages. ## Why This Matters for Workers This ruling reinforces that workers have legal protection when they report sexual harassment. Employers cannot legally punish employees for speaking up about mistreatment. If a company fires someone shortly after they complain about harassment, courts will scrutinize whether the stated reason is truthful. Workers who face retaliation for reporting problems may have grounds to sue for compensation.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Discrimination casesRetaliation casesHarassment casesWrongful Termination cases

Similar Rulings

Con Ed v. NLRB
U.S. Supreme CourtDec 1938
Mixed Result
Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
U.S. Supreme CourtFeb 1951
Remanded
Vega
2nd CircuitSep 2015
Remanded
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School and St. Francis Xavier Church
D.C. CircuitJul 1997
Remanded
Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
U.S. Supreme CourtApr 1941
Plaintiff Win
Read Full OpinionMore FLC & Brothers Rebel, Inc. RulingsAll Rulings

Browse Related

More rulings from VirginiaMore discrimination casesMore hospitality & food service employer cases

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

Check My RightsLearn the Basics

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.