Skip to main content

McDaniel v. West Virginia Division of Labor

WVADecember 8, 2003No. 31272, 31273Cited 16 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Davis, Albright, Megraw, McGraw
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The West Virginia Supreme Court affirmed the circuit court's decisions in both consolidated cases: reversing the hearing examiner's finding that Larry McDaniel was liable as an officer, but affirming that L. Dean Schwartz and Michael Johnston were officers liable for unpaid wages and expenses (though reversing the award of liquidated damages by the administrative agency).

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** This case involved unpaid wages at McDaniel, Inc. (MCDI), where workers weren't paid what they were owed. The West Virginia Division of Labor went after company officers personally, trying to hold them responsible for the unpaid wages. Three officers were targeted: Larry McDaniel, L. Dean Schwartz, and Michael Johnston. **What the Court Decided** The West Virginia Supreme Court made a split decision. The court ruled that Larry McDaniel, despite being an officer, was not personally liable for the unpaid wages. However, the court confirmed that L. Dean Schwartz and Michael Johnston were officers who could be held personally responsible for paying the workers' unpaid wages and expenses. The court did remove some additional penalty damages that had been awarded earlier. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling shows that workers may be able to collect unpaid wages directly from company officers when their employer doesn't pay them. However, not every officer can be held responsible - it depends on their specific role and involvement in the company's operations. This provides workers with another potential avenue to recover stolen wages when the company itself cannot or will not pay what's owed.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.