Skip to main content

D. A. S. Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Chao, Secretary of Labor

U.S. Supreme CourtMay 23, 2005No. 04-978
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal
Circuit
2nd Circuit

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The Supreme Court denied petitioner D.A.S. Sand & Gravel's petition for certiorari, leaving intact the Second Circuit's decision affirming the Department of Labor's administrative action.

What This Ruling Means

**D.A.S. Sand & Gravel v. Secretary of Labor (2005)** This case involved a dispute between D.A.S. Sand & Gravel, Inc. and the U.S. Department of Labor. While the specific details of the original dispute aren't provided in the available information, it appears the company challenged an employment-related action or decision made by the Secretary of Labor. The Supreme Court declined to hear the case, which means they refused to review it. When the Supreme Court does this, the lower court's decision automatically stands as final. In this instance, the lower court had ruled in favor of the Secretary of Labor against the company. This outcome matters for workers because it shows the Supreme Court allowed a pro-worker ruling to remain in place. When employers challenge Department of Labor decisions and lose, it typically means workplace protections or worker rights were upheld. The fact that the highest court in the land chose not to overturn this decision suggests the legal principles involved were well-established or that the Department of Labor was acting within its proper authority to protect workers' interests.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.