Skip to main content

Burke v. Union Pacific Resources Co.

Tex. App.—6th Dist.June 9, 2004No. 06-02-00183-CVCited 61 times
Mixed ResultUnion Pacific Resources Company$1,500,000 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Morriss, Ross, Carter
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The trial court awarded the Burkes $1.5 million in damages for breach of contract against Union Pacific Resources Company, but the appellate court affirmed the judgment while suggesting a remittitur (reduction) of damages. The court barred the Burkes' negligence claim on statute of limitations grounds and rejected PWW's tortious interference claim.

What This Ruling Means

**Burke v. Union Pacific Resources Company: Employment Contract Dispute** The Burke family had a contract dispute with Union Pacific Resources Company over what appears to be broken promises or agreements related to employment or business dealings. The case involved multiple legal claims, including breach of contract, negligence, and interference with business relationships. The court sided with the Burkes on the main contract issue, awarding them $1.5 million in damages from Union Pacific. However, the appeals court suggested this amount might be too high and could be reduced. The court dismissed the negligence claim because it was filed too late under the statute of limitations. A separate claim involving tortious interference against another party (PWW) was also rejected. This case matters for workers because it shows that courts will enforce employment contracts and hold companies accountable when they break their promises. However, it also demonstrates important limitations: workers must file certain types of claims quickly before deadlines expire, and winning doesn't guarantee keeping the full damage award. The mixed outcome shows that even successful employment lawsuits can face challenges on appeal, making it crucial for workers to understand their contract terms and legal deadlines.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.