Skip to main content

Roe v. Cheyenne Mountain Conference Resort

D. Colo.January 11, 1996No. 1:95-cv-02152Cited 15 times
Mixed ResultCheyenne Mountain Conference Resort
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Brimmer
Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
790 Other labor litigation
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Failure to AccommodateBreach of Contract

Outcome

Plaintiff prevailed on her ADA claim that the Resort's policy requiring disclosure of legal prescription medications violated the ADA's prohibition on disability-related inquiries without demonstrating job-related necessity. Defendant prevailed on plaintiff's common law privacy and public policy claims.

What This Ruling Means

What Happened
An employee at Cheyenne Mountain Conference Resort challenged the company's policy that required workers to disclose all their legal prescription medications to their employer. The employee argued this policy violated her rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and invaded her privacy.

What the Court Decided
The court sided with the employee on her main claim. It ruled that the resort's blanket policy requiring disclosure of prescription medications violated the ADA because employers cannot ask disability-related questions unless they can prove those questions are necessary for the specific job. However, the court rejected her other claims about privacy violations and public policy.

Why This Matters for Workers
This ruling protects workers' medical privacy rights. Employers cannot automatically demand to know what prescription medications you take just because you work there. They can only ask about medications if they can show a clear, job-related reason why they need that information. This gives workers important protection against overly broad medical inquiries that could lead to discrimination based on health conditions or disabilities.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.