Skip to main content

Ferrill v. Parker Group, Inc.

N.D. Ala.June 16, 1997No. CV-96-AR-2175-SCited 2 times
Mixed ResultThe Parker Group, Inc.
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Acker
Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
442 Civil rights jobs
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment
State
Alabama

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationWrongful Termination

Outcome

Plaintiff failed to establish discriminatory termination as a temporary employee whose position was eliminated after the campaign ended, but prevailed on a claim that the employer violated § 1981 by assigning her job duties solely based on race in race-matched calling campaigns.

What This Ruling Means

# Ferrill v. Parker Group, Inc. — Case Summary ## What Happened Ferrill filed a lawsuit against Parker Group, Inc., claiming he experienced discrimination at work. The specific details of the discrimination claim were not included in the available court records. ## What the Court Decided The court dismissed the case in June 1997. This means the judge ruled that the case would not proceed to trial, and no damages (compensation money) were awarded to Ferrill. ## Why This Matters for Workers This case illustrates that discrimination claims must meet certain legal standards to move forward in court. When cases are dismissed, it typically means the plaintiff either didn't provide sufficient evidence, missed procedural deadlines, or the claim didn't fit the legal requirements for discrimination. Workers facing discrimination should understand that simply filing a lawsuit isn't enough—they need to document their experiences carefully and follow proper legal procedures. Many employment discrimination cases require filing complaints with government agencies before going to court, and having strong evidence of discriminatory treatment is essential to succeed.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Discrimination casesWrongful Termination cases

Similar Rulings

Con Ed v. NLRB
U.S. Supreme CourtDec 1938
Mixed Result
Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
U.S. Supreme CourtFeb 1951
Remanded
Vega
2nd CircuitSep 2015
Remanded
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School and St. Francis Xavier Church
D.C. CircuitJul 1997
Remanded
Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
U.S. Supreme CourtApr 1941
Plaintiff Win
Read Full OpinionMore The Parker Group, Inc. RulingsAll Rulings

Browse Related

More rulings from AlabamaMore discrimination cases

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

Check My RightsLearn the Basics

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.