Skip to main content

Biondo v. Union Insurance Company of Providence

Mo. Ct. App.December 6, 2005No. ED 86301Cited 1 time
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Gaertner, Romines
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The appellate court affirmed summary judgment in favor of Union Insurance Company, rejecting the appellant's breach of insurance policy claim for foundation damage.

What This Ruling Means

# Biondo v. Union Insurance Company of Providence ## What Happened Biondo filed a lawsuit against Union Insurance Company of Providence, claiming the company breached their insurance policy by refusing to cover damages to a building's foundation. ## What the Court Decided The appellate court sided with the insurance company. The judges upheld an earlier court decision that rejected Biondo's breach of contract claim. The insurance company did not have to pay damages for the foundation damage. ## Why This Matters for Workers This case demonstrates that courts carefully examine insurance policy language when disputes arise. When an insurance company denies a claim, they may win in court if the policy terms support their decision. For workers relying on insurance coverage—whether through employer-provided policies or personal coverage—this ruling shows the importance of thoroughly understanding exactly what your policy covers and doesn't cover before needing to file a claim. It's wise to ask questions and get clarification about policy limits and exclusions upfront, rather than discovering gaps in coverage when damage occurs.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.