Skip to main content

Kotlowski v. Eastman Kodak Co.

W.D.N.Y.April 16, 1996No. 6:94-cv-06028Cited 27 times
Defendant WinEastman Kodak Co.
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Larimer
Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
442 Civil rights jobs
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationRetaliationFailure to AccommodateWage Theft

Outcome

Eastman Kodak Co.'s motion for summary judgment was granted, dismissing all of plaintiff Kotlowski's discrimination, retaliation, and equal pay claims under the ADA, ADEA, Title VII, EPA, and NYHRL.

What This Ruling Means

**Kotlowski v. Eastman Kodak Co. (1996)** **What Happened:** Employee Kotlowski sued Eastman Kodak Company claiming the company discriminated against him, retaliated against him for complaining, failed to provide reasonable accommodations for a disability, and didn't pay him equally compared to other workers. He filed claims under several federal and state laws that protect workers from discrimination and ensure equal pay. **What the Court Decided:** The court ruled entirely in favor of Eastman Kodak. The judge granted the company's request for summary judgment, which means the court dismissed all of Kotlowski's claims without a trial. The court found that Kotlowski didn't present enough evidence to support any of his discrimination, retaliation, accommodation, or wage theft claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act, Age Discrimination in Employment Act, Title VII, Equal Pay Act, and New York Human Rights Law. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This case shows how challenging it can be for workers to win discrimination and retaliation lawsuits. To succeed, employees must gather strong evidence documenting unfair treatment, policy violations, or unequal pay. Simply alleging discrimination isn't enough—workers need concrete proof to support their claims in court.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.