Skip to main content

National Labor Relations Board v. Reliable Electric Construction Co.

10th CircuitJune 15, 2001No. 00-9522
Defendant WinReliable Electric Construction Company, Inc.$520,000 at issue
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Henry, Briscoe, Murphy
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

Claim Types

Retaliation

Outcome

The NLRB's appeal for enforcement of its backpay award was granted. The court upheld the Board's determination that Reliable Electric Construction is the successor corporation liable for the award and that the corporate veil should be pierced to hold Anthony Prilika jointly and severally liable for the debt exceeding $520,000.

What This Ruling Means

**Workers Win Big in Retaliation Case Against Construction Company** This case involved workers at Reliable Electric Construction Company who were illegally retaliated against for exercising their rights under federal labor law. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) had previously ruled that the company owed the workers over $520,000 in back pay, but the company refused to pay. The federal appeals court sided with the workers and ordered the company to pay the full $520,000. The court made two important rulings: first, that even though Reliable Electric had restructured as a "successor corporation," it was still responsible for paying the workers. Second, the court "pierced the corporate veil," meaning they held the company owner, Anthony Prilika, personally responsible for the debt if the company couldn't pay it. This ruling is significant for workers because it shows that employers can't simply reorganize their business to avoid paying what they owe to workers they've wronged. It also demonstrates that company owners can be held personally accountable when they use their corporation to cheat workers. The decision strengthens protections for employees who face retaliation for standing up for their workplace rights under federal labor law.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Retaliation cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.