Skip to main content

National Labor Relations Board v. King Soopers, Inc.

10th CircuitDecember 27, 2001No. 00-9540
Plaintiff WinKing Soopers, Inc.
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Tacha, McKay, Anderson
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

RetaliationDiscrimination

Outcome

The National Labor Relations Board prevailed in its petition for enforcement of its order against King Soopers, Inc. The court affirmed the Board's findings that King Soopers violated the National Labor Relations Act by threatening a union shop steward with discharge, discriminatorily enforcing bulletin board policies, and refusing to furnish relevant information to the union.

What This Ruling Means

**King Soopers Violated Workers' Union Rights, Court Rules** This case involved King Soopers grocery stores and their treatment of union workers. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) accused the company of breaking federal labor law in several ways: threatening to fire a union shop steward, unfairly enforcing rules about what could be posted on employee bulletin boards to target union materials, and refusing to provide information that the union needed to represent workers effectively. The court sided with the NLRB and ordered King Soopers to follow the labor board's ruling. The judges agreed that the company had violated the National Labor Relations Act through these anti-union actions. The court found that King Soopers was retaliating against union activities and discriminating against workers involved in union organizing. This ruling matters for workers because it reinforces important protections under federal law. Employees have the right to union representation without facing threats or retaliation from their employers. Companies cannot selectively enforce workplace rules to suppress union activities, and they must cooperate with unions by providing necessary information for worker representation. This decision helps ensure that workers can organize and participate in union activities without fear of punishment from their employers.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.