Skip to main content

Johnson v. General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc.

D.N.H.December 18, 2009No. Civil 09-CV-282-JLCited 20 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Citation
675 F. Supp. 2d 236, 2009 DNH 194, 187 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3183, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 119625
Judge(s)
Joseph N. Laplante
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of ContractWhistleblower

Outcome

The district court denied the defendant's motion to dismiss for improper venue but transferred the entire case to the District of Massachusetts, finding that New Hampshire was an improper venue for the USERRA claim under the statute's exclusive venue provision.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** Johnson sued General Dynamics Information Technology, claiming the company breached his contract and retaliated against him for whistleblowing. Johnson filed his lawsuit in New Hampshire federal court, but the company argued the case should be heard elsewhere. **What the Court Decided** The court ruled that while New Hampshire wasn't the wrong place to file the lawsuit initially, it wasn't the right court to handle Johnson's military service-related claims under a law called USERRA (which protects workers' military service rights). The court transferred the entire case to Massachusetts federal court instead of dismissing it outright. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case shows that where you file your lawsuit matters greatly, especially if you have claims related to military service. The USERRA law has specific rules about which courts can hear these cases. Workers should know that even if they file in the wrong court, judges may transfer their case to the right location rather than throwing it out completely. This gives workers a second chance to have their claims heard, though it may cause delays and additional costs in pursuing their case.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.