Skip to main content

Walsh v. Long Term Disability Coverage for All Employees Located in United States of DeVry, Inc.

N.D. Ill.March 9, 2009No. 07 C 1478Cited 5 times
Defendant WinDeVry, Inc.
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
James F. Holderman
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wrongful Termination

Outcome

Defendant Prudential's motion for summary judgment was granted and plaintiff's motion was denied. The court found that Walsh did not meet the definition of disability under the ERISA plan terms, as she was capable of performing sedentary work with minimal accommodations.

What This Ruling Means

**Worker Loses Disability Benefits Case Against DeVry** This case involved an employee named Walsh who worked for DeVry, Inc. and was seeking long-term disability benefits through her employer's insurance plan provided by Prudential. Walsh claimed she was disabled and unable to work, but the insurance company denied her benefits claim. Walsh sued both DeVry and Prudential, arguing that she was wrongfully denied disability coverage that she was entitled to under her employee benefits plan. The case centered on whether Walsh met the plan's definition of being disabled. The court ruled against Walsh and in favor of the defendants. The judge found that Walsh did not qualify as disabled under the terms of her employer's benefit plan because she was still capable of performing desk work with minor accommodations. The court granted summary judgment for Prudential, meaning Walsh's case was dismissed without going to trial. **What this means for workers:** This case highlights how difficult it can be to win disability benefit claims. Insurance companies and courts apply strict definitions of disability, and being able to perform any type of work—even with limitations—may disqualify you from benefits. Workers should carefully review their disability plan terms and gather strong medical evidence before filing claims.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.