International Union, United Mine Workers v. Mine Safety & Health Administration
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Ginsburg, Rogers, Garland
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Published
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- appeal
- Circuit
- D.C. Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Outcome
The court granted the petition for review in part and denied it in part. The court remanded the training requirement provision as arbitrary and capricious because MSHA failed to adequately explain why annual hands-on training was required instead of quarterly training as recommended by NIOSH research. The court denied the petition regarding the refuge volume provision, finding it was a logical outgrowth of the proposed rule and neither arbitrary nor capricious.
What This Ruling Means
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.